About the SA Blog Network

Extinction Countdown

Extinction Countdown

News and research about endangered species from around the world
Extinction Countdown Home

Polar Rare: The Arctic’s apex predator could disappear from Hudson Bay in 10 years

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

polar bearCanada’s western Hudson Bay could lose its population of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in as little as a decade, according to new research by biologist Andrew Derocher and others from the University of Alberta (U.A.).

Derocher tells Yale Environment 360 that the polar bears in western Hudson Bay have lost 25 percent of their population in the past three decades. During that time, the animals’ average body weight has dropped by 27 kilograms and females have lost 10 percent of their body length.

Much, if not all, of this has been caused by the loss of sea ice in the region. Polar bears rely on this ice for hunting and rearing their young. Hudson Bay polar bears now spend three more weeks on land than they did three decades ago, for a total of nearly five months, during which time they are unable to hunt, burning off two pounds of fat per day.

According to calculations by Derocher and his team, led by U.A. mathematical biologist Peter Molnar, the western Hudson Bay polar bears could die out in 25 to 30 years, or maybe in as few as 10 if there are several years in a row with low sea-ice conditions. "One of the things we found was that the changes in this population could happen very dramatically," Derocher said. "And a lot of the change could come within a single year if you just ended up with an earlier melt of sea ice."

Globally, there are 19 populations of polar bears. The population in Hudson Bay is one of the most accessible by humans, and has therefore been studied more heavily than most.

Photo: Polar bear, via Wikipedia

Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. jaqcp 7:21 pm 07/12/2010

    I guess if I want to hunt any I had better do it soon before they get too small to look impressively mean while mounted in my office entry way.

    Link to this
  2. 2. jakkadan 8:23 pm 07/12/2010

    u need mounting on the f….n’ wall u sick shit 4 brains

    Link to this
  3. 3. jakkadan 8:36 pm 07/12/2010

    what is it with u yank’z or is it wank’z and ur guns, ur ‘oh!! so brave with ur weapons. u think u can go shoot anything u want, without any consideration to the cost. what i would love to see would be for the likes of you and a polar within 50feet of each other , then i’d like to your guns shoved up ur arse and then we would see who really was the man. i’d give it 5minutes b4 u were crying like the baby u r.

    Link to this
  4. 4. Dolmance 11:21 pm 07/12/2010

    I believe, from the language you use that you’re either from Britain or in or around Australia. In both places you’ve shot just about everything.

    You have to think global – we’re all pigs.

    Link to this
  5. 5. Neptunerover 5:38 am 07/21/2010

    Habitat loss happens on planet Earth regardless of humans. It’s been going on for hundreds of millions of years. Species that are overspecialized don’t make it when things change. That’s the thing about life though, there’s always something there to replace it. The extinction of polar bears would be an opportunity for other species. Polar bear prey, experiencing less predation, might then be able to overpopulate (another natural and necessary occurrence, during which variation increases along with the number of individuals, setting the species up to be better prepared for the inevitable population crash, be that from disease, habitat loss, a new predator, or whatever.)

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American


Get All-Access Digital + Print >


Email this Article