ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Expeditions

Expeditions


Field notes from the far reaches of exploration
Expeditions HomeAboutContact

Kermadec Trench: A Turn for the Worse

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Seafarers have a strange way of describing things sometimes. For example, 1st officer Steve described today as being a “funny old day” and Captain Lindsey described the weather as “freshening.” This translates to being an absolute disaster of a day, mostly due to the fact the weather turned absolutely terrible.

At first light we brought in the hadal-lander in a swell and wind that was really pushing us to the limit. Then there was the fish trap. Oh, the fish trap.

It surfaced okay, but was being hauled around so much in the swell that it could not take it anymore. I had designed it in such a way that if the worst happened, the acoustic release (the expensive bit) could be ripped out of the trap and then the trap would end up suspended below it by two safety lines.

The ripping out of the release happened all by itself, but what I didn’t realize is that in such bad weather one of the safety lines actually sawed through the aluminium frame, leaving the large trap swinging precariously off the stern. We did our best to fight it and managed to get one of the tag lines secured, just in time for the second safety line to saw through the frame as well and we ended up towing the cage behind the frame. It was all going horribly wrong very quickly. After another few valiant attempts by the crew to salvage it, the tag line eventually snapped as the swell was just too much for it and we lost the trap. Having salvaged the acoustic release and all the floats, which account for about 95 percent of its cost, it isn’t too big a deal, just very disappointing given the time I have invested in building it and the fact it had produced such great samples. The main thing was that nobody was hurt during the operation. We are all seasoned professionals and are trained to handle such unfortunate weather.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, we decided that we should still recover the abyssal-lander as the chances are the weather would stay the same or get worse. So we did. The next problem, not related to the weather, although ultimately it made the whole situation worse, was that our lazy buoy had imploded at depth, which meant there was no target rope in which to grapple from the surface. Again in the heavy swell, we all did our best to get the lander on board despite the mooring line resembling a bird’s nest. With a bit of luck, and a lot of swearing, it was eventually landed and we scored another good set of data.

Discussions were had, chins were scratched, tea was drank, and decisions was made to end science due to bad weather. In this swell, it is too risky for the gear and those involved in the recovery.

That’s not to say we haven’t completed our task, as we have. Everything from now on was just a bonus. I really wanted a shot at going after some more snailfish and supergiant amphipods at 7,000 meters, but that is not going to happen now. Instead we have two options – try and deploy the gear to 1,000 meters off East Cape, or, if the swell is still too great, head further south to Poverty Bay off Gisborne and try there.

Yeah, been a funny old day.

Also, check out the videos from the trip.

Previously in this series:

Kermadec Trench: Cook, Kermadec and Kaharoa
Previous research in the Kermadec Trench
Kermadec Trench: Scuttling your Assets
Kermadec Trench: Boring eels
Kermadec Trench: The Cosmopolitan Rattail
Kermadec Trench: The deep-water womble
Kermadec Trench: Like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle…

Alan Jamieson About the Author: Dr. Alan Jamieson is a lecturer at the University of Aberdeen, U.K. His research focuses primarily on the use of novel deep-submergence technology for deep-sea biological research, particularly at hadal depths (6,000 to 11,000 meters deep). Dr. Jamieson is the leader of this expedition, which is his tenth one to hadal trenches.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. mhuff1294 7:16 pm 02/4/2013

    Sorry, but I have to do this. Ahem. Tea was “drunk.” You used the indicative preterite form of to drink, “drank,” to describe the coffee where a past participle should have been. The past participle of “to drink” is “drunk.”

    In short, you drank the coffee. The coffee was drunk. The drunk coffee, the coffee that you drank, was drunk after you drank it.

    Cheers!

    Link to this
  2. 2. dadster 4:35 am 02/5/2013

    Aren’t there any microbes under the deep sea ? Nothing is found mentioned here .what’s their genre? And , how do they operate ? Can we have some light thrown on this too, please?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Black Friday/Cyber Monday Blow-Out Sale

Enter code:
HOLIDAY 2014
at checkout

Get 20% off now! >

X

Email this Article

X