ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network

Posts Tagged "tribe of science"

Doing Good Science

Mentoring new scientists in the space between how things are and how things ought to be.

composite-square-02

Scientists mentoring trainees often work very hard to help their trainees grasp what they need to know not only to build new knowledge, but also to succeed in the context of a career landscape where score is kept and scarce resources are distributed on the basis of scorekeeping. Many focus their protégés’ attention on the [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Adjudicating “misbehavior”: how can scientists respond when they don’t get fair credit?

composite-square-02

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I recently gave a talk at UC – Berkeley’s Science Leadership and Management (SLAM) seminar series. After the talk (titled “The grad student, the science fair, the reporter, and the lionfish: a case study of competition, credit, and communication of science to the public”), there was a discussion [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Some thoughts about the suicide of Yoshiki Sasai.

composite-square-02

In the previous post I suggested that it’s a mistake to try to understand scientific activity (including misconduct and culpable mistakes) by focusing on individual scientists, individual choices, and individual responsibility without also considering the larger community of scientists and the social structures it creates and maintains. That post was where I landed after thinking [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

When focusing on individual responsibility obscures shared responsibility.

composite-square-01

Over many years of writing about ethics in the conduct of science, I’ve had occasion to consider many cases of scientific misconduct and misbehavior, instances of honest mistakes and culpable mistakes. Discussions of these cases in the media and among scientists often make them look aberrant, singular, unconnected — the Schön case, the Hauser case, [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

On the value of empathy, not othering.

composite-square-01

Could seeing the world through the eyes of the scientist who behaves unethically be a valuable tool for those trying to behave ethically? Last semester, I asked my “Ethics in Science” students to review an online ethics training module of the sort that many institutions use to address responsible conduct of research with their students [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Do permanent records of scientific misconduct findings interfere with rehabilitation?

composite-square-01

We’ve been discussing how the scientific community deals with cheaters in its midst and the question of whether scientists view rehabilitation as a live option. Connected to the question of rehabilitation is the question of whether an official finding of scientific misconduct leaves a permanent mark that makes it practically impossible for someone to function [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Faith in rehabilitation (but not in official channels): how unethical behavior in science goes unreported.

composite-square-01

Can a scientist who has behaved unethically be rehabilitated and reintegrated as a productive member of the scientific community? Or is your first ethical blunder grounds for permanent expulsion from the community? In practice, this isn’t just a question about the person who commits the ethical violation. It’s also a question about what other scientists [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Resistance to ethics instruction: considering the hypothesis that moral character is fixed.

composite-square-02

This week I’ve been blogging about the resistance to required ethics coursework one sometimes sees in STEM* disciplines. As one reason for this resistance is the hunch that you can’t teach a person to be ethical once they’re past a certain (pre-college) age, my previous post noted that there’s a sizable body of research that [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Pub-Style Science: dreams of objectivity in a game built around power.

composite-square-01

This is the third and final installment of my transcript of the Pub-Style Science discussion about how (if at all) philosophy can (or should) inform scientific knowledge-building. Leading up to this part of the conversation, we were considering the possibility that the idealization of the scientific method left out a lot of the details of [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Pub-Style Science: exclusion, inclusion, and methodological disputes.

composite-square-02

This is the second part of my transcript of the Pub-Style Science discussion about how (if at all) philosophy can (or should) inform scientific knowledge-building, wherein we discuss methodological disputes, who gets included or excluded in scientific knowledge-building, and ways the exclusion or inclusion might matter. Also, we talk about power gradients and make the [...]

Keep reading »

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Give a Gift &
Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now! >

X

Email this Article

X