ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network

Posts Tagged "tribe of science"

Doing Good Science

On the value of empathy, not othering.

composite-square-01

Could seeing the world through the eyes of the scientist who behaves unethically be a valuable tool for those trying to behave ethically? Last semester, I asked my “Ethics in Science” students to review an online ethics training module of the sort that many institutions use to address responsible conduct of research with their students [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Do permanent records of scientific misconduct findings interfere with rehabilitation?

composite-square-01

We’ve been discussing how the scientific community deals with cheaters in its midst and the question of whether scientists view rehabilitation as a live option. Connected to the question of rehabilitation is the question of whether an official finding of scientific misconduct leaves a permanent mark that makes it practically impossible for someone to function [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Faith in rehabilitation (but not in official channels): how unethical behavior in science goes unreported.

composite-square-01

Can a scientist who has behaved unethically be rehabilitated and reintegrated as a productive member of the scientific community? Or is your first ethical blunder grounds for permanent expulsion from the community? In practice, this isn’t just a question about the person who commits the ethical violation. It’s also a question about what other scientists [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Resistance to ethics instruction: considering the hypothesis that moral character is fixed.

composite-square-02

This week I’ve been blogging about the resistance to required ethics coursework one sometimes sees in STEM* disciplines. As one reason for this resistance is the hunch that you can’t teach a person to be ethical once they’re past a certain (pre-college) age, my previous post noted that there’s a sizable body of research that [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Pub-Style Science: dreams of objectivity in a game built around power.

composite-square-01

This is the third and final installment of my transcript of the Pub-Style Science discussion about how (if at all) philosophy can (or should) inform scientific knowledge-building. Leading up to this part of the conversation, we were considering the possibility that the idealization of the scientific method left out a lot of the details of [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Pub-Style Science: exclusion, inclusion, and methodological disputes.

composite-square-02

This is the second part of my transcript of the Pub-Style Science discussion about how (if at all) philosophy can (or should) inform scientific knowledge-building, wherein we discuss methodological disputes, who gets included or excluded in scientific knowledge-building, and ways the exclusion or inclusion might matter. Also, we talk about power gradients and make the [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Pub-Style Science: philosophy, hypotheses, and the scientific method.

composite-square-01

Last week I was honored to participate in a Pub-Style Science discussion about how (if at all) philosophy can (or should) inform scientific knowledge-building. Some technical glitches notwithstanding, it was a rollicking good conversation — so much so that I have put together a transcript for those who don’t want to review the archived video. [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

On speaking up when someone in your profession behaves unethically.

composite-square-01

On Twitter recently there was some discussion of a journalist who wrote and published a piece that arguably did serious harm to its subject. As the conversation unfolded, Kelly Hills helpfully dropped a link to the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics. Even cursory inspection of this code made it quite clear that the [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Don’t be evil: Obligations of scientists (part 3)

composite-square-01

In the last installation of our ongoing discussion of the obligations of scientists, I said the next post in the series would take up scientists’ positive duties (i.e., duties to actually do particular kinds of things). I’ve decided to amend that plan to say just a bit more about scientists’ negative duties (i.e., duties to [...]

Keep reading »
Doing Good Science

Scientists’ powers and ways they shouldn’t use them: Obligations of scientists (part 2)

composite-square-02

In this post, we’re returning to a discussion we started back in September about whether scientists have special duties or obligations to society (or, if the notion of “society” seems too fuzzy and ill-defined to you, to the other people who are not scientists with whom they share a world) in virtue of being scientists. [...]

Keep reading »

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Dinosaurs

Get Total Access to our Digital Anthology

1,200 Articles

Order Now - Just $39! >

X

Email this Article

X