ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Cross-Check

Cross-Check


Critical views of science in the news
Cross-Check Home

RIP Military Historian John Keegan, Who Saw War as Product of Culture Rather Than Biology

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



John Keegan, whom The New York Times called “the preeminent military historian of his era,” is dead. 78 years old, he died after a long illness in England, where he was born and bred. Among his 20-plus books was A History of Warfare (Alfred A. Knopf, 1993), one of the best-written and most insightful investigations of violent conflict that I’ve read. Keegan takes you through the entire history of war, from the ancient Greek battles chronicled by Thucydides right up through the Cold War and the First Gulf War.

Keegan’s book serves as a potent counterpoint to—and more, refutation of—popular claims by scientists such as Richard Wrangham and Edward O. Wilson that war stems from deep-rooted biological impulses we share with chimpanzees. Keegan weighed and rejected these theories as well as ones attributing war to environmental and economic factors, notably overpopulation and scarcity of resources.

Although he declared war to be an “entirely masculine activity,” Keegan also viewed it as cultural more than biological. As he put it, war is “always an expression of culture, often a determinant of cultural forms, in some ways the society itself.” Keegan’s view of war overlapped with that of Margaret Mead, who saw war as not a “biological necessity” but as an invention. War, Keegan proposed, stems primarily neither from “human nature” nor economic factors but from the “institution of war itself.” War, in other words, is a self-perpetuating meme.

Evolutionary psychologists and others who favor biological theories of war cannot dismiss Keegan—as they often dismiss other critics of their stance—as a lefty peacenik postmodernist. Keegan, who came from a military family, taught at the Royal Military Academy in Sandhurst and was the military affairs editor for The Telegraph, knew far more about war than the bio-theorists do.

Keegan clearly admired many soldiers and aspects of the martial culture. But he was appalled at how immensely destructive war had become as it evolved, especially in the West. As I point out in my book, The End of War, Keegan traced the Western style of war back to the win-at-all-costs philosophy of ancient Sparta. This ruthless attitude, he suggested, combined with increasingly deadly tactics and weaponry, helped European states (and, later, the U.S.) gain control over much of the world. But Western powers also turned on each other, with catastrophic consequences.

Keegan once said that, after decades of studying World War I, he was more baffled than ever as to why it had erupted. World War I “terminated European dominance of the world and, through the suffering it inflicted on the participant populations, corrupted what was best in their civilization—its liberalism and hopefulness,” he wrote. World War II “completed the ruin.”

Keegan questioned the famous dictum of the Prussian statesman Carl von Clausewitz that “war is the continuation of policy by other means.” The cataclysmic conflicts of the modern era, Keegan asserted, show how war can become an end in itself, pursued well past any sensible benefits for states, leaders or citizens. War’s absurdity is embodied in nuclear weapons, which pose a threat to all of humanity.

Although steeped in knowledge of humanity’s capacity for stupidity and cruelty, Keegan was nonetheless an optimist, who believed that we have the potential to reject the war meme once and for all. In A History of Warfare, written immediately after the Cold War and the Gulf War had ended, he cited the thesis of political scientist John Mueller that war—like human sacrifice, slavery, dueling and other noxious customs–may be vanishing.

Consider these quotes from Keegan’s book: “Despite confusion and uncertainty, it seems just possible to glimpse the emerging outline of a world without war.” “The effort at peace-making is motivated not by calculation of political interest but by repulsion from the spectacle of what war does.”

And finally: “War, it seems to me, after a lifetime of reading about the subject, mingling with men of war, visiting the sites of war and observing its effects, may well be ceasing to commend itself to human beings as a desirable, or productive, let alone rational, means of reconciling their discontents. This is not mere idealism. Mankind does have the capacity, over time, to correlate the costs and benefits of large and universal undertakings. Throughout much of the time for which we have a record of human behavior, mankind can clearly be seen to have judged that war’s benefits outweighed its costs, or appeared to do so when a putative balance was struck. Now the computation works in the opposite direction. Costs clearly exceed benefits.”

Pessimists will surely dismiss Keegan’s vision of a world without war as naïve. I like to think he was prescient. Read A History of Warfare and decide for yourself.

Postscript: On August 17-18, I will speak at the 2012 Kateri Tekakwitha Peace Conference near Albany, N.Y. Hope to see you there.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

 

About the Author: Every week, hockey-playing science writer John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A teacher at Stevens Institute of Technology, Horgan is the author of four books, including The End of Science (Addison Wesley, 1996) and The End of War (McSweeney's, 2012). Follow on Twitter @Horganism.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. SoniaStorm 4:38 am 08/5/2012

    Keegan’s book sounds interesting, but I have some questions.

    How does Keegan respond to more sophisticated treatments of war that include a biological component? I’m thinking of Steve Pinker here. The idea that war is *just* a meme seems a bit facile. For instance, if it’s just a meme, why is it confined to males?

    Keegan argues that war originated in Europe, but violent inter-group conflict has occurred throughout the history of humanity. The Europeans were just more organized. Yes, states were invented, but once you have a state, it seems very natural that inter-group violence would become mediated by the state. That begs the question, why so much inter-group violence? I think Pinker would answer: biology!

    Pinker also makes some biologically-based arguments that some social set-ups make violence (including war) more or less likely. He backs these up with statistics from different societies. Does Keegan address this?

    Link to this
  2. 2. 4RAYRICE 8:14 pm 08/6/2012

    As the son of an American blinded in WWI ,I was fascinated by the history as told by John Keegan. The British suffered horribly in this war. As a result Keegan’s history was very Anglo oriented. It did not seem to me that he credited the Yanks for a major contribution to end the horror at the cost of thousands of lives (and in my case a family that was headed bya veteran legally blind)

    Link to this
  3. 3. 4RAYRICE 8:16 pm 08/6/2012

    this is not a duplicate. cancel duplicates
    As the son of an American blinded in WWI ,I was fascinated by the history as told by John Keegan. The British suffered horribly in this war. As a result Keegan’s history was very Anglo oriented. It did not seem to me that he credited the Yanks for a major contribution to end the horror at the cost of thousands of lives (and in my case a family that was headed bya veteran legally blind)

    Link to this
  4. 4. gesimsek 8:45 am 08/7/2012

    As long as people are ready to sacrifice morality for money and power, wars will continue.

    Link to this
  5. 5. feralBoy 9:50 am 08/11/2012

    RIP John Keegan. A History of Warfare and The First World War are two of the greatest (and most tragic) books I’ve ever read. (p.s. Came across yr blog by accident via a Facebook post. I’ll be a regular reader from now on!)

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Back To School

Back to School Sale!

12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X