About the SA Blog Network

Critical Opalescence

Critical Opalescence

Making the transition from confusion to comprehension, on all scales
Critical Opalescence Home

Hacking the Quantum: A New Book Explains How Anyone Can Become an Amateur Quantum Physicist

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

For years I’ve been thinking and hoping that quantum physics would become the next hacker revolution. DIYers in their basements, garages, and hackerspaces have already pioneered radio communications, PCs, household robots, and cheap 3-D printers—why not quantum entanglement, cryptography, computers, and teleportation? In recent years, physics educators have streamlined quantum experiments to the point where advanced amateurs could do them at home. I’ve tried to encourage the trend by inviting a Sci Am article on how to make a quantum eraser with a laser pointer and, last week, blogging about a particle detector in a plastic party tumbler.

In the latest issue of Make magazine, I learned about an extraordinary book that could do for quantum homebrewers what Popular Electronics magazine did for Jobs and Wozniak in the ’70s. Written by the father-daughter team of David and Shanni Prutchi, Exploring Quantum Physics Through Hands-On Projects takes you from basic particle-wave demonstrations all the way up to quantum random-number generators. The associated website follows up with detailed advice and other projects. Had you asked me a month ago, I would have said that an atomic clock is surely beyond the capacity of even the most dedicated hobbyist. Now I know better.

I happened to be down in Philadelphia, near where the Prutchis live, for a conference two weeks ago, and David (shown above with his other two daughters, Abigail and Hannah—Shanni was still at school) kindly gave me a tour of their basement lab. The first clue that it wasn’t just any suburban house was the radio telescope in the backyard, which Shanni used to map the Milky Way’s hydrogen gas in fifth-grade. The living room tchotchkes included an old Civil Defense radiation meter and blown-glass Crookes tubes. The lab itself, about the size of a one-car garage, is a work of art in its own right, lined with snazzy electronics, such as spectrum analyzers, as well as contraptions out of a Victorian experimental philosophy lab, such as van de Graaf generators. It’s better outfitted than some academic labs I’ve seen, but David modestly insisted they cobbled it together from Home Depot, eBay, and dumpster dives at local high-tech firms. The book offers tips for how to do the same.

More than equipment, though, experimentation requires persistence. Shanni said she shudders at the effort it took to prove quantum spooky action at a distance. The principle is simple (see this video my colleagues and I made); the practice is a different story. For instance, the experiment requires light detectors that are sensitive enough to detect single photons, which means they are also prone to the tiniest sliver of stray light. David and Shanni kept them dark by enclosing the apparatus in a set of nested black boxes, which they had to open and close to make any adjustment—and an experiment of this sort requires a lot of adjustments. “I hated that black box,” Shanni told me. “There were days I didn’t want to do the experiment. It was very frustrating, but it all paid off. We were actually able to disprove local hidden variables—and I’m a high-school senior.”

Photos by George Musser

George Musser About the Author: is a contributing editor at Scientific American. He focuses on space science and fundamental physics, ranging from particles to planets to parallel universes. He is the author of The Complete Idiot's Guide to String Theory. Musser has won numerous awards in his career, including the 2011 American Institute of Physics's Science Writing Award. Follow on Twitter @gmusser.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. gesimsek 4:33 pm 10/22/2012

    It is good to know that there are still people out there interested in making things instead of making money.

    Link to this
  2. 2. S. N. Tiwary 8:57 pm 10/22/2012

    It is highly interest generating and mind boosting article. Bringing Quantum Physics in day to day life is itself wonderful.
    S. N. Tiwary

    Link to this
  3. 3. claynaff 7:45 am 10/23/2012

    This is way cool. I mean, like Bose-Einstein condensate cool! Thanks for sharing this, and a tip ‘o my cap to the Prutchis.

    I’m just curious to know something: if you use nested boxes to screen out stray photons, don’t you still have to be concerned about thermal radiation within the last box? Or can you set photon detectors such that they ignore lower frequencies?

    Keep on quantuming!

    Clay Farris Naff
    Science & Religion Writer

    Link to this
  4. 4. George Musser in reply to George Musser 8:38 am 10/23/2012

    Yes, I believe they have a narrow bandwidth.

    Link to this
  5. 5. ScottMaxwell 4:20 am 11/11/2014

    With all the technological advances in science today, anything is possible. Dangers are present, just as well as the benefits. More explained here –

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article