Skip to main content

The digital alterations behind an insect field-guide photo

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Microdaceton, a miniature trap-jaw ant (Kibale Forest, Uganda).

I'd love to claim that images spring forth from my camera fully-formed & beautiful, surpassing any need for downstream correction. Alas, no. Even my best shots are improved with a little tweaking. In this post I explain how I crunch a raw capture to produce a field-guide type photograph.

For brevity I will leave aside the details of the original exposure*. During the session I snapped 15 takes of the ant, deleted the worst on-camera, and imported the following files to Adobe Lightroom:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After selecting an acceptable image on the basis of focus and aesthetics, I noted the following problems:

  1. The ant is too far off-center to the left, a hazard of a moving subject.

  2. The magnification is not strong enough, leaving too much white space for too little ant.

  3. The whites are too gray.

  4. The substrate has distracting dirt specks.

Still in Lightroom, I performed the following adjustments to correct problems 1-3:

Lightroom is a powerful program, but for those without it, similar manipulations can also be done in Photoshop, Photoshop Elements, and other common imaging software.

After cropping out the unused right portion of the image to bring more ant into the image, I dealt with problem #4- the dirt- by exporting this levels-adjusted file to Adobe Photoshop:

Why Photoshop? I prefer it to Lightroom for the nitty-gritty of dealing with little imperfections like sensor dust and substrate dirt. Lightroom can remove spots as well, but Photoshop gives more control.

With spots removed I'm ready to make the final adjustments. Captures from the Canon MP-E macro lens are naturally soft, so I used photoshop's "unsharp mask" to bring crispness to the image.

The whole process takes about 5 minutes, with another few minutes devoted to keywording the metadata. This miniature trap-jaw ant is now ready for my commercial galleries, my facebook page, and my Google + stream!

*If you must know: Canon 7D dSLR with an MP-E 65mm 1-5x macro lens at 4x, lit with diffuse twin flash, the ant walking about on white plastic.

[h/t to Ted MacRae, whose recent Tiger Beetle post inspired this article]

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild