ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Anthropology in Practice

Anthropology in Practice


Understanding the human experience.
Anthropology in Practice Home

Labor Day: It’s About Time

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



CC, Tom Blackwell. Click on image for license and information.

The first Monday in September is a federal holiday in the United States. It marks Labor Day—a tribute to contributions made by American workers to the growth and development of the country (or at least those in a position to contribute without being exploited).

The history of labor day is the history of labor—and laborer rights. Not too long ago, American workers were subject to horrible working conditions. Twelve, fourteen, even eighteen hour workdays were common; children as young as five were put to work in mines and factories; and benefits, like healthcare—or even simply access to fresh air and bathrooms—were virtually unheard of. As the Industrial Revolution gained ground and more people migrated to manufacturing jobs, labor unions also began to grow. They organized rallies and strikes and protested these poor conditions. The most famous and deadly of these is the Haymarket Riot of 1886, during which a bomb was thrown at police when they tried to dispatch the crowd. Seven officers and four civilians died and numerous others were wounded. The day became an international day of observance for workers.

A similar, though more peaceful event, is attributed as the precursor to Labor Day: On September 5, 1882, 10,000 workers took unpaid time off to march in New York City in what was essentially the first Labor Day parade. This idea of a “workingman’s holiday” was seized by other metropolitan areas and recognized by their states as holidays. However, federal sanctioning of the holiday didn’t happen until 1894. During that year, employees of the Pullman Palace Car Company in Chicago striked to protest wage cuts and the firing of union representatives. The American Railroad Union joined them in a show of solidarity that brought rail travel to an effective halt. Federal intervention only fueled greater unrest, and in an effort to later restore relations with American workers, Congress recognized Labor Day as a holiday.

That is not to say that the struggle for laborer’s rights ended. Unions have had a tumultuous history in the narrative that brings us to this Labor Day. Unions have been criticized for creating wage imbalances, reducing profitability, and reducing the availability of jobs. They’ve been charged with corruption and racism, creating monopolies, and generating social unrest. But perhaps the most frequent and public criticism relates to efficiency. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before:

A: “How may union workers does it take to change a light bulb?”
B: “Fifty.”
A: “Fifty?!”
B: “Yeah—fifty. It’s in the contract.”

Union labor is often highly specialized, requiring multiple workers to get a job done, and this becomes a point of tension as technology reduces the need for manual labor in some cases. For example on the west coast in many ports, shippers have relied on chalkboards to dispatch longshoremen because there has been opposition to introducing computers to manage the process. Management sees technology as a way to improve and retain business by preventing shippers from looking for more modern ports and increasing profitability, while longshoremen see this as a threat to their livelihood.

There’s no question that technology has helped to create a safer workplace. But there’s also no question that technology is changing the workplace—as well as the laborer. In the coming years, we’ll have to redefine what it means to work because there is no question that we’ll see more and more automation of labor. Skills may become less of a commodity. Laborer rights will have to be re-evaluated and redefined. And the struggles between the worker and management will continue. Which is why it’s probably easy to lose sight of the most valuable victory the American labor movement won for it’s workers in Labor Day: Time.

Labor Day is a day off for many people. It’s a paid day off. It’s a workday where labor is not required. Now this isn’t true for everyone. There will be open restaurants with a working staff, and open stores with a working staff, and there are countless undocumented workers for whom Labor Day is no different. But for many around the globe, the struggle for basic rights and wages continues. While we’re no longer obligated to work twelve hour days in the United States, in places like Bangladesh, China, India, and Turkey, clothing workers are working in buildings that have failed fire and structural inspections for less than a living wage. And they are likely working twelve hour days. As Marx teaches us, time is the ultimate commodity. We’re paid for how long we work, not necessarily by how much we work. And with Labor Day, the American unions gave some of that time back to the worker.

So if you’re observing the holiday weekend, make the most of it. It was hard won.

Krystal D'Costa About the Author: Krystal D'Costa is an anthropologist working in digital media in New York City. You can follow AiP on Facebook. Follow on Twitter @krystaldcosta.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 4 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. jtdwyer 1:44 am 08/31/2013

    “As Marx teaches us, time is the ultimate commodity. We’re paid for how long we work, not necessarily by how much we work.”

    While your points are undoubtedly valid re. the mistreatment of labor in developing countries, what Marx taught me is that overly simplistic generalizations are the tool of rhetorical misrepresentations.

    I’m not sure what a “anthropologist working in digital media in New York City” is doing for a living, but I always considered that, as a computer programmer, for example, I was paid for producing computer programs required by my employer. Others programmers may have felt that they were merely putting in their required time in the workplace, but over time they seemed to be paid less for their time than I was.

    Link to this
  2. 2. porvy 4:02 am 08/31/2013

    Maybe it’s right as it says,workers need more time(that’s mean they can gain more),because they are paid for how long they work not by how much they work.But ,why they have this notion subconsciously in our Labor Day.It’s the policy determines.Indeed they need much money to support their family,however they ignore their rights they deserve,they seem to be numb ,only richness counts in their eyes.Therefore,they would like to get more time to work.What’s the real effective policy?

    Link to this
  3. 3. rkipling 12:28 am 09/1/2013

    This isn’t 1886 anymore, thankfully. It’s absolutely true that workers were exploited in hideous ways. Had I lived in those times, I’m sure I would have been part of the labor movement. But allow me to share a more recent experience with union labor.

    You say workers are paid by the hour, not by what they contribute. Well, under union rules there is no other choice. In the ’70s I worked at a union organized chemical plant. I was an idealistic young engineer who wanted to make a contribution. I sought and got good information from union workers who were the closest to the process. They were eager to share what they knew. Nobody had asked for their help before. Together we saved millions of dollars in increased productivity. I was happy to share the credit. When the union workers learned they wouldn’t share in the increased profits, they told me they would never help me again. I explained that their contract specifically prevented them from receiving merit pay. That didn’t matter. They weren’t going to help ever again.

    I learned a lot at that facility. One of the lessons was don’t work where there is a union shop. I moved on to a better job at a different company. The union workers at the first plant stayed true to resisting productivity. Less than 10 years later, over 2,000 union workers lost their jobs when the plant closed because it couldn’t compete. That didn’t have to happen. Apparently losing all the jobs was preferable to reducing their members through attrition due to increased productivity.

    In my factories, we never stop educating our hourly workers in ways to make them more valuable. We are low cost in our industry, but have the highest pay scale (higher than unionized competitors.) We also have the best safety record. Workers are recognized for superior performance individually, and all employees share in the upside of company profits.

    That’s how to be a real labor advocate. Constantly train. Allow them the dignity of participation. Then pay them for success.

    Marx teaches workers nothing. His teachings have not benefited workers. You can’t point to a single success of communism.

    Have a great Labor Day, Comrade D’Costa.

    Link to this
  4. 4. Labor Day’s Violent Roots: The Hard Won Fight for Your Three-Day Weekend | The Lowdown 2:38 pm 01/14/2014

    [...] provide a good overview on the history of Labor Day. Additionally, these articles from PBS and Scientific American give good background information, as does this Lowdown post on May Day and its relation to Labor [...]

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Back To School

Back to School Sale!

12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X