About the SA Blog Network

The Barry White Syndrome: Why Are Deep Voices Attractive?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Darth Vader had one thing going for him: a deep voice.

The ranks of George Clooney, Denzel Washington, Clint Eastwood, Don LaFontaine, and Barry White includes a common factor: A lower pitched voice—considered a positive masculine feature associated with with older, heavier, taller, hairier, and more attractive men (1). Studies have demonstrated a female preference for men with deeper voices as short-term partners (and preference seems to vary across the menstrual cycle, peaking during the height of fertility) (2,3). And elsewhere, research finds that North American men with lower-pitched voices report higher numbers for sexual partners in comparison to men with higher-pitched voices (4); and that Hazda men with lower-pitched voices have more living offspring (pitch is not an indicator of fecundity, but mate suitability) (4). Sexual selection has been proposed as a reason for deeper voices—the timbre and pitch suggest an attractive, fertile encounter. But a December PLoS paper reports that men with deeper, attractive voices have lower sperm quality than men with less attractive voices. Is there a evolutionary basis for voice preference?

There is certainly a link between testosterone and voice pitch: when testosterone levels begin to rise during puberty, it triggers changes in the larynx and in the vocal cords resulting in lower pitched voices. So deeper voices become associated with other manifestations (like facial hair) of testosterone, and consequently, perceived sexual fitness. Women (and likely men) consistently make positive judgments about masculinity based on voice pitch that include both physiological and behavioral traits. In addition to the characteristics noted above, men with lower pitched voices are perceived as being physically larger (taller, heavier) and are believed to be better fighters and providers (4).

These assessments aren’t entirely made up. There is evidence that secondary sexual traits can predict health and fertility of a partner. Brilliant colors and showy displays have long been natural indicators of potential sexual fitness. For example, deer with bigger, more complex antlers also have larger testes and more motile sperm (5). Lower frequency sounds have been linked to larger body size across all primate species:

“The vocal tract is made up of hard tissue, its length being related to both
skull and skeletal size and the size of the tract determines the resonance frequencies of calls. The resonance frequencies, known as formant frequencies, are emphasized frequencies within vocalizations. [In] rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, the length of the vocal tract and the formant frequencies produced are both related to body size (6).”

Essentially, larger individuals have smaller differences between formant frequencies, which results in lower-pitched vocalizations. It is possible that at some point in our evolutionary history, vocal pitch may have been an important factor in mate determination, working in much the same way as other displays in the animal kingdom.

However, semen analysis reveals that men with deeper voices have lower scores on seven motility parameters (7)—even when the lifestyle and environmental factors are accounted for. While men with deeper voices may have more sexual partners, they seem less prepared to pass on their genes.* Researchers believe the lower sperm quality reflects a trade-off that comes with having to compete for mates:

“Animals have finite resources to partition amongst reproductive activities, and the theoretical models of sperm expenditure assume a basic trade-off between male investment in attracting mates and in gaining fertilizations. Recent studies of non-human animals are providing empirical evidence for this basic life-history trade-off. A number of studies have also reported short-term declines in semen quality associated with social dominance. In domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus, and arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, for example, males becoming more dominant after a social challenge show a reduction in semen quality, while in cockroaches, Nauphoeta cinerea, both dominant and subordinate individuals suffer a reduction in ejaculate sperm counts resulting from the establishment of dominance hierarchies (4).

It appears then, that this secondary sexual trait which is linked to sexual maturity has become tied to social signs of maturity as well—taken to be economic and social stability. Which is a perception we find duplicated in popular culture:

“In movies and television larger men have deeper voices. This may reflect preconceptions, or may give rise to those preconceptions. Whichever is cause and which effect, it seems certain that larger men are expected to have deeper voices (8).

The broad-shouldered male hero has long stood as a symbol of status, meant to be respected and held to be an object of admiration. Male movie villains with deep voices are notable in that they appear powerful and inspire fear. Lest we fall into the trap of blaming everything on media, in the real world the perceived stability resulting from a long career and respect within a community may be tied to age and accomplishments, but seem to be viewed as general indicators of maturity, and as such are correlated with secondary sexual characteristics.

However, perhaps there’s a shift occurring: Male heroes aren’t always of the deep-voiced variety—and there has been a tendency to depict the deep-voiced, broad shouldered male hero as a bumbling idiot/arrogant fool/less intelligent companion (e.g., see such favorites as How To Train Your Dragon and Shrek (Prince Charming). In these instances, proof of ability outweighs assigned skills. That is, having a deeper voice doesn’t necessarily grant one status … though it might make for an delightful musical interlude.


*Clearly, not all men with deeper voices are infertile. They seem to do just fine generally. (Maybe those deeper voices help increase opportunities for them to pass on those genes—we just don’t know. But we can talk about it.) In any event, it bears noting that lower sperm quality is NOT the direct result of having a deeper voice. That is, once your voice deepens, your sperm count and motility don’t drop off. If that were the case, most men would be in serious trouble once their voices changed during puberty. It is interesting, however, to note that this perceived marker of sexual prowess (an extremely deep voice) may not actually reflect the whole picture. And may be quite telling about our own perceptions of masculinity. [Added  01/08/12 kd]

1. Collins. (2000): 778. | 2. Simmons (2011). | 3. Collins (2000) | 4. Simmons (2011): 4. | 5. Simmons (2011): 1 | 6. Collins (2000): 773. | 7. Average path velocity, straight line velocity, velocity along the sperm cells point-to-point track, lateral amplitude of sperm movement, frequency with which the sperm head crosses the average sperm path, the straightness of the sperm’s path, and the linearity of the sperm’s path. | 8. Collins (2000): 778.

Collins SA (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60 (6), 773-780 PMID: 11124875

Feinberg, D., Jones, B., Little, A., Burt, D., & Perrett, D. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices Animal Behaviour, 69 (3), 561-568 DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.012

Simmons, Leigh, Peters, Marianne, & Rhodes, Gillian (2011). Low Pitched Voices are Perceived as Masculine and Attractive but Do They Predict Semen Quality in Men? PLoS One, 6 (12), 1-6 : 10.1371/journal.pone.0029271

Krystal D'Costa About the Author: Krystal D'Costa is an anthropologist working in digital media in New York City. You can follow AiP on Facebook. Follow on Twitter @krystaldcosta.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. sci-guy 9:14 pm 07/10/2012

    This was quite an interesting article and one that was relatively suprising to me. If men with deeper voices tend to have lower quality sperm, than why has selection favored a deeper voice? This is an intersting question, as most primatologist would agree that many males pass on their genes despite their social status, but what is puzzling is what biological aspect creates lower qualitry sperm in these males and why do women continually favor this trait, at least for sexual purposes.

    It is intersting to think that females are somehwat fooled into thinking that deeper voiced males = better genes, but history, according to this post, has proven otherwise. It would be intersting to conduct an experiment and see if mate choice, at least in humans, is really this superficial, or if there is some camouflauging going on by certain males who disguise their genes through their secondary sexual characteristics.

    Unfortunately, only humans possess the ability to speak or produce actuall speech, so this is hard to replicate or investigate in other species. It woyuld be intersting to see if pitch in other animals shows similar results.

    Link to this
  2. 2. MsMalcontent 9:10 pm 02/10/2013

    —”and there has been a tendency to depict the deep-voiced, broad shouldered male hero as a bumbling idiot/arrogant fool/less intelligent companion” — Do you think that maybe “trends” such as this one are a possible result of the fact that less and and less males are of the truly masculine variety? And that this attack is an attempt to render truly male males as ridiculous and less attractive? Especially since so many males in the arts, Hollywood, etc are gay? And even in hetero males – the stereotypical male traits are for some reason disappearing at warp speed? So – it would make sense that a “modern” male who lacks the once-(still) desirable masculine traits would attempt to de-value and trivialize traits he does not posses and has no chance of attaining – so instead he hopes to re-educate females into a different view of the attractive male – one that fits HIS description.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article